Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Larch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I went to the band's website, and all of the releases are either self-released or released by labels which seem to have released absolutely nothing from other bands. Nothing independent written about them. Sorry, but seems to fail WP:MUSIC spectacularly. --- Deville (Talk) 23:08, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Larch

Dubious CSD A7 candidate. I speedied this more than a couple of times, but because someone mentioned in his edit to this article that they [seem] to have released a couple on BMI, I'm bringing it here to seek a consensus either to keep or to delete. Please don't tag this as either CSD G4 or A7. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 17:57, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

• I came across a reference to this band in the following entry:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acoustic_kitty

I decided to post an entry for the band as seems it would be better to have an entry rather than a link that leads to nowhere. As to the band's association with BMI: the band's publishing company is administered by them. Ian Roure

• Delete I learned from Episode 12B, How to Recognise Different Trees from Quite a Long Way Away what The Larch is truly. I can tell you it is not this bit of band vanity, but a mighty tree. Moland Spring 20:31, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

The Larch has been making music under that name since 1997. It is an established musical entity that is noted for the highly original

subject matter of it's songs. Ian Roure

• Delete as WP:VSCA and failing WP:V --Dennette 10:45, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

I think there should be an entry for the band since it is referenced in one of the other entries. If you object to the way the entry is written you could always rewrite it or tell me what you object to and I'll rewrite it. Ian Roure

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.