Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hobbit (2010 movie)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 19:10, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] The Hobbit (2010 movie)

The movie has not been confirmed just Peter Jackson saying the movie is least 4 years away. [1] Way too early to make an article about it. Wikipedia is not a movie gossip website. In addition, a $300 million budget? Man, inflation must raise the price of a blockbuster movie big time if it is true. --Anonymous Cow 04:02, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Comment. I had some trepidation along those lines - I tried to spruce the article up, having heard things to the same effect, but I found little substance to work with. At this point, I'm willing to concede that it is probably irretrievable, and should be merged into The Hobbit until a deal is inked. -- 8^D ^gab 05:11, 2005 Apr 2 (UTC)
• Delete. As much as I desperately would like this to be true (please please please please) Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. There's very little that could be merged into The Hobbit apart from the sheer speculation, and I don't think that belongs in that article, either. This should just go away until it's a for-sure thing, or at least as for-sure as things get in Hollywood. android↔talk 05:38, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)
  • Not only is it speculation, it's terribly poor speculation... I just noticed that whoever wrote this listed Ian Holm as playing Bilbo again. Right. Ian will be 79 years old in 2010. That's a tad old to play a 51-year-old hobbit, especially considering Elijah Wood was 20 when he was cast as the 33-year-old Frodo. android↔talk 05:46, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. --InShaneee 06:52, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, though a reference and link to the story should probably be included on Peter Jackson's article and the Hobbit page under adaptations. Just no need for an independent article on a movie that isn't happening yet. Postdlf 08:39, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete until any sort of official announcement is made. --Kitch 14:57, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with the appropriate section of The Hobbit page. It can be split out later if the movie happens. — RJH 17:11, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete imaginary fancruft. --Smithfarm
• Delete, this is garbage. All real or relevant information can be found elsewhere. There is no evidence to support a 2010 release either. K1Bond007 19:12, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Dpbsmith (talk) 22:11, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Waaaaaay to early for this sort of thing. Wait till there's an official announcement. I think it's OK to perhaps include a one-liner about a speculative movie in the The Hobbit article, but we certainly can't list any cast members at this early stage either. 23skidoo 00:09, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Idle speculation at this point. 23skidoo's comment about a short note in The Hobbit is a good idea, though. -- Dcfleck 01:47, 2005 Apr 7 (UTC)
• Delete. Do not mention it anywhere. Wikipedia is not in the business of making predictions or reporting rumors. Rossami (talk) 03:07, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.