Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Escapist (magazine)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 00:29, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Escapist (magazine)

The Escapist (magazine) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

No assertion of notability. Fails WP:WEB. No media references or sources to back it up, only its website. At this time the article doesn't even have a talk page. Less than 50 edits in the whole article for over a year. Anomo 05:09, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Article needs sources, not deletion. --Dhartung | Talk 06:49, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep: Quite notable and now it's been updated with references. Ben W Bell talk 08:25, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. Kudos to Dhartung for the addition of sources. Mitaphane _talk 01:59, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Dhartung's editing & addition of sources brings it up to snuff.SkierRMH 04:09, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the kudos! --Dhartung | Talk 06:55, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep obviously notable - Whiskey Pete
• Keep per pretty much everyone. What does 50 edits per year have to do with anything? RFerreira 05:41, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep now that article has been properly sourced by Dhartung. Nice save! -- Satori Son 21:27, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.