Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Confession
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the nomination was delete. – Avi 14:40, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The Confession
another band promo page linking to (gasp!) their myspace account I actually was looking for the movie The confession starring Yves Montand and Simone Signoret; these vanity/promo pages are not harmless Reimelt 00:42, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. (Liberatore, 2006). 11:43, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy A7 per nom. No assertion of notability. Fails WP:BAND. The article on the film, incidentally, will be under its French title L'Aveu, but it's not been written yet. Tevildo 14:05, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Keep Their official website is clearly commercial and it details (albeit not very clearly) a tour at various locations throughout the USA. Plus they're on AMG [1] and their record's on Amazon [2]. --IslaySolomon 15:32, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- comment I would note that "getting" your record on Amazon requires you to procure a UPC symbol, and essentially nothing else; the whole point of AMG, meanwhile, is to be a complete listing whether its inclusions are notable or not--surely that's not to be WikiPedia's guideline. In short, there's a reason neither Amazon nor AMG are in the guidelines. I don't want any war over this, but having been an editor at a music magazine, I assure you there are many thousands of bands across the globe that sell in various chain stores and have opened for a more notable band. I'm inclusionist by nature, but this is the title of a notable topic (at least, it will re-direct to the french title, I hope.) Reimelt 18:59, 5 July 2006 (UTC) BTW, I forgot to add, per telvido, no assertion of notability; Islay defends the article as it could be not as it is. Reimelt 19:42, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
