Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Carlow Crab (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted, WP:CSD criterion G4 (repost of deleted content). Guy (Help!) 22:17, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Carlow Crab

The Carlow Crab (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Delete; violates WP:V, plain and simple. More than likely WP:BALLS or some sort of fan fiction for which Wikipedia is not the appropriate venue. Kinu ^t/_c (éŕ) 20:25, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

• No wonder NPWatcher appended "(2nd nomination)" to this... it's been deleted before. I believe CSD G4 applies in this case. Admins, can we close this one? --Kinu ^t/_c (éŕ) 20:26, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Speedy Delete. Article is essentially gibberish. ~~ Meeples (talk)(email) 20:33, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Keep Good article that should have been here for longer, Zhanle 20:59, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

• Looks like the work of the North Carolina Vandal. Already speedied. --Kinu ^t/_c (éŕ) 21:01, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.