Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Blackwell Legacy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The article is within bounds per WP:CRYSTAL. Jay(Reply) 19:08, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Blackwell Legacy

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Non-notable. Original research. No reliable sources to support importance. Fails WP:SOFTWARE. Andre (talk) 21:44, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom 195.114.94.194 23:21, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Much as I hate crystal-balling, the release date (stipulated by the developer) is now.. 4 days away? This particular developer has software which garners multiple reviews and seems to be very well received by the adventure game community. For the life of me, I can't see the point in deleting what's here for the sake of waiting for the inevitable reviews to appear as sources. This isn't just another freeware breakout clone. QuagmireDog 00:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I am actually a beta-tester on this game, and although I think its release may be a few days late, it will certainly happen this month. When reviews come out, I will add them as sources. If the article is deleted, it will be recreated in a few months anyway. The original "Bestowers of Eternity" game (from which this article was renamed/merged with) did win 2 AGS Awards, too. --Amaccormack 10:59, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. AGS awards (which may not be notable at all) for a related game do not establish the notability of this game. Chondrite 08:55, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep This game is notable because it is the next game from the studio which released The Shivah which has garnered a significant ammount of press, (it's currently mentioned on the front page of cnn.com) and as such the studio and related products (especially this one as it's so very near release) are notable.--Wogoat 17:13, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 04:01, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

• VERY weak keep Looks like Shivah is headed for a keep now, so maybe this is notable too.. if the article still looks like this in a month, delete it. Perel 07:48, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Koweja 16:06, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Not only has the Shivah been kept, but the creator of this game's article has also passed AFD and been kept. Potential sources for reviews of this game (as soon as it is released) are already used as sources for The Shivah. It's just a matter of time now. QuagmireDog 21:06, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. This has NOTHING to do with WP:CRYSTAL, plus looks notable enough. I would like to see more information added though. --Wizardman 18:01, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.