Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ace Crusader

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:26, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Ace Crusader

This article is being considered for deletion because of lack of information.

• Delete Has no decent info for this wrestler. Clay4president

At least add much more info to the article if you don't want it deleted.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Clay4president (talk • contribs) .

• Neutral I am too unfamiliar with the subject matter to evaluate without more research. The only reason I'm commenting at all is to post the Ace Crusader's profile at this blog/fansight since I already did that legwork.--Fuhghettaboutit 22:49, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
  • If the comment above mine (and added after mine) is directed at me, I think you misread; if it isn't, I'm invoking the Emily Litella clause.--Fuhghettaboutit

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 17:41, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Not a notable wrestler, never wrestled for a major organization. DrunkenSmurf 01:51, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete As per above, not a notable wrestler. Oddly enough there is a Michael Phillips that wrote a review about the movie Nacho Libre that generate more google hits with "Michael Phillips" and "wrestler" --zero faults ^{|sockpuppets|} 14:03, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.