Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terry Carlino (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Ξxtreme Unction|_{yakkity yak} 16:44, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Terry Carlino

This was nominated on AfD here, speedy-deleted as {{nn-bio}}}} and resurrected by User:Tony Sidaway.

The article states that Terry is a member of the technical staff at Thomas Jefferson Accelerator Facility (crew chiefs seem to be shift leaders) and has published an online manual on the Freelance Traveller RPG. As such, this really fails WP:BIO. Pilatus 23:22, 14 December 2005 (UTC)</nowiki>

• I am sure that he is very good at his job but I see no indication of notability. Still a speedy delete for mine. Capitalistroadster 01:29, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Seems to be a tad more than just a shift leader. Has run workshops at CERN and contributed to the JLAB historical archives. This suggests some degree of international recognition and a pivotal role at the lab. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 14:00, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
  • You mean this one link here where he gave a presentation at CERN? This is the academic circuit, they all give presentations every now and then. I have given a talk on a European research project and won't ever get a page here. Terry still fails the "average professor" test. Pilatus 18:15, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. This is purely a case of being overzealous in undeleting speedied articles. Undeleting the others was justified, but sending stuff like this to AfD just wastes peoples time. Ambi 23:02, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete and padlock - like its predecessor, it makes no attempt to demonstrate notability. B.Wind 01:33, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Maybe in 5 years he'll be good enough for Wikipedia. -- Naif 03:51, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete but being an author is a claim to notabilty that should be examined by the community not a single person. Kappa 05:07, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
  • He is the "author" of his website, not of a printed book published by a regular (read non-vanity) publisher. Speedy delete was a good call. Pilatus 03:13, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete I'm not seeing notability here. | Klaw ¡digame! 20:09, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.