Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terrifying Tales of Recess
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Terrifying Tales of Recess
- Note: This debate has not yet been categorized. Please select an appropriate debate category and update the code letter in the {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD}} template.
- - (View log)
One in a long string of articles for Recess show that fails to establish notability. Postcard Cathy 13:05, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 11:52, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - virtually empty, no assertion of notability, WP:NOT#IINFO, fails ATT, RS, N, the usual. Moreschi Request a recording? 16:35, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep This is an episode of a television series. It's pretty easily established that it could be expanded the same as any other television series's episodes can be expanded. So it's a stub. Stub isn't a reason for deletion. At the most, redirect to List of Recess episodes pending further expansion. Mister.Manticore 20:02, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep There is a consensus to improve and not delete articles like this at WP:EPISODE. You can redirect them if you want, as well. These Recess episodes are being completed, but slowly. - Peregrine Fisher 20:26, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - notable television series, the consensus is to improve these articles, not delete them. Matthew 20:27, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete A detailed reading of the discussion page at the centralized discussion leads me to the conclusion that there was not consensus for stub articles for epsodes, but rather for only general articles until there was sufficient material to break it out into session articles, and then eventually into ones for each episode. These articles are none of them even approaching the stage of individual episode articles. The discussion frequently referred to school articles as a model, and I think its clear that discussions here are against individual articles until the material is sufficient. The bulk of the discussion was some months ago, and there were notes at the end that the consensus in the more generally interested WP community was moving against episode articles. At any rate, it behooves us to state our independent views here. Speedy as empty is my view. DGG 04:26, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
