Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Temple of Wotan (book)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Deizio talk 17:09, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Temple of Wotan (book)

Temple of Wotan (book) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Prod disputed with reason "I agree that it should probably be deleted but as a "published" book its notability should be reviewed in AfD". Article on author deleted due to lack of notability/attack, no indication why either book or author is notable. Nominating for deletion accordingly. Seraphimblade 06:19, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete: No assertion of notability. Also, this comes quite close to CSD A1. Heimstern Läufer 07:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete May be notable, but unless evidence is forthcoming it should be removed. Akihabara 07:27, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. MER-C 07:30, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn self-published book Dragomiloff 10:47, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, but cross-reference @ Wotanism. A rather insignificant self-published book which was heavily plagiarized from other sources and then given a neo-nazi spin. - WeniWidiWiki 18:36, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to a list of Nazi poppycock, deleting it will just make it pop-up again in a week or month or year. Alf photoman 23:47, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

• Keep The material by Miguel Serrano makes it useful. Also, the book is connected to The Order (group), a significant terror group in USA history.--Tsmollet 21:00, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Only the foreward is by Serrano. Also, the book has nothing whatsoever to do with the Order, other than the fact that the (ex)wife of David Lane edited it. This is long after his involvement with the Order. There is no content, and it is unverifiable. One line of text is not an encyclopedia entry.- WeniWidiWiki 21:11, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Ummm, which part about "stub" do you not understand? You know, wikipedia is literally awash with crap such as this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rambone, and people are targeting articles useful to the pagan community..... --Tsmollet 23:57, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

• merge with Wotanism or some other article dealing with Nazi nonsense. dab (𒁳) 09:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, perhaps speedily, with {{db-nocontext}}, or {{db-empty}}. Ceci n'est pas une ébauche. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:32, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete article does not assert meeting any of the criteria at the proposed guideline Wikipedia:Notability (books) (WP:BK), nor does it demonstrate any sort of notability on any other basis. GRBerry 22:11, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.