Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Temple of Nod
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the nomination was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 20:47, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Temple of Nod
Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Command & Conquer Red Alert Infantry, where these articles used to be a redirect to Structures_of_the_Brotherhood_of_Nod and Ariel units of the Global Defense Initiative, but the pre-redirect text was restored. I think the arguements on the other AfD are valid. Wikipedia is most not a how-to guide This is fancruft, and I don't want to see a revert war on content that probably should've been listed along with this. I don't feel speedy is appropreate, since it had a good deal of content other than the redirect, so AfD seems like the right thing if this article is to go with the rest of them. Kevin_b_er 04:50, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- TomStar81 nominated Orca aircraft for deletion and pointed the template here, and I'll support co-listing it as well in this discussion. Unless altered, Bwithh and Alphachimp's comments do not reflect this added entry. Kevin_b_er 05:13, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- Comment. I support the co-listing. My deletion vote and reasoning stand. Thanks for the talk page message. Alphachimp talk 05:18, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete In this form the articles are too game oriented; I can not make a valid argument for saving them. Note that this is not a creation of deleted material, as these pages existed before the mass merge into the larger list articles since deleted by Proto. There are a handful of these pages around, they should be listed in the C&C template soon so that they can all be seen. TomStar81 04:54, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. Please try to stay civil. There's no real need for all caps. Alphachimp talk 05:04, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Have you read the article(s)? If you take the time to actually read them you would see that they do not tell you how to do anything, although in this case they are decidely game cruft. Come on people, use a little common sense. TomStar81 05:09, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. Yes, I read the articles and I agree that they are gamecruft. I just didn't think the all caps was appropriate. Alphachimp talk 05:19, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for saying so. I went ahead and just removed the whole comment. TomStar81 05:37, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. Yes, I read the articles and I agree that they are gamecruft. I just didn't think the all caps was appropriate. Alphachimp talk 05:19, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Have you read the article(s)? If you take the time to actually read them you would see that they do not tell you how to do anything, although in this case they are decidely game cruft. Come on people, use a little common sense. TomStar81 05:09, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. Please try to stay civil. There's no real need for all caps. Alphachimp talk 05:04, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete gamecruft including the Orca plane thing Bwithh 05:03, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete yup gamecruft Alphachimp talk 05:04, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete both articles - I missed them when trying to clear out the crufty crufty cruft. Proto///type 08:42, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete both, excessive gamecruft. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 13:00, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.