Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team Gizka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mindmatrix 00:56, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Team Gizka

nn Lbbzman 01:35, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Non notable (and I'm bored just reading and searching for info on this eek.)Obina 02:09, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable online gaming group. —Quarl ^(talk) 2005-12-31 02:32Z
• Online gaming group. Forum possesses just short of 700 users, of which a maximum of 18 have ever been on simultaneously. Alexa of 1.7 million and falling. Google has 125 hits, of which 52 are unique. No evidence of high-end media notability evident in my brief search of the Google results. Therefore, fails WP:WEB. I'd like a Speedy Delete (Expanded A-7) for non-notable groups (failing the notability guidelines at WP:WEB), but don't like my odds. Delete -- Saberwyn - The Zoids Expansion Project 05:00, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete or Speedy per Saberwyn's research. --Pboyd04 16:17, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - notable in the KOTOR community (a notable modmaking group developing a notable KOTOR II mod, made sticky on the Obsidian Entertainment forums), but not sufficiently notable for Wikipedia. If Cut Ending to Knights of the Old Republic II and M4-78 were deleted, then this one probably should be. - Sikon 15:30, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Not notable enough for encyclopedia. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 00:10, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.