Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarendra Lakhankar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Daniel.Bryant 08:02, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tarendra Lakhankar

Tarendra Lakhankar (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Does not meet Wikipedia:Notability (academics). — ERcheck (talk) 00:37, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. NN per nom --froth^T 00:39, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Per Nomination and it doesn't meet requirements under Wikipedia:Notability (academics). :^) §†SupaSoldier†§ 00:40, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. NN and COI - main author is Lakhankar himself. --Nevhood 01:11, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Veesicle (Talk) (Contribs) 03:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Does not meet the guidelines of WP:BIO or WP:PROF, and it's a conflict of interest. Leebo⁸⁶ 16:38, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete WP:COI and WP:NN, fails them both!Tellyaddict^{Editor review!} 17:42, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above.  V60 ^{VTalk · VDemolitions · Editor review 2!} 23:47, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- Pete.Hurd 05:03, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. John Vandenberg 12:43, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Some of the above -cited guidelines are pretty uncertain, but under the general criteria he NN. Few if any postdocs are N because of their scientific work at that point in their career.DGG 00:49, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
• DeleteRamduke — Ramduke (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Delete If a degree made you notable, we'd run out of server space. Mocko13 16:18, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

•  :-) my head hurts just thinking about trying to define notability based on degree. John Vandenberg 22:04, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.