Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tale of Two Brothers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was nomination withdrawn. Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 01:42, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Tale of Two Brothers
This is a story, the text of which is in the public domain. Originally, I helped the editor move it to Wikisource, which they did, but this article was never actually deleted. I don't know what to quite class it as, but I think it needs to be deleted, and so I am bringing it here. J Milburn 20:00, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Not an encyclopaedia article - just a story. Chairman S. Talk Contribs 21:39, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete since it's been wikisourced, and there is no encyclopedic content herein, the original should be deleted. SkierRMH,00:47, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep after removing unencyclopedic content. The tale of two brothers is perfectly capable of having an encyclopedic article written about it without having the whole narritive here. In fact, if we remove said content, there is more here worth saving than many other stubs have. I'm going to fix this now, if noone minds... Thanatosimii 20:51, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- There. Still needs work (catagorization for one), but clearly there are now better alternatives than deletion. Thanatosimii 21:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep after revisions by Thanatosimii, who has created a solid stub article.--Alabamaboy 21:06, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: Nice work, I didn't think it was salvagable. Certainly worth keeping now, I will work on the article a little further. J Milburn 21:08, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
