Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tadeusz Piechura

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was keep. Sango123 17:22, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tadeusz Piechura

No relevant encyclopedia information, just looks like a list of awards Superwad 02:41, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

• Keep but it does need to be rewritten in an encyclopedic style. Google returns his name plenty of times DavidHumphreys ^{SPEAK TO ME}ABOUT_{THE THINGS I MESSED UP} 11:22, March 30, 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Seems to meet WP:BIO as a notable member of his field. E.g., [1] [2] [3]. I agree text would be nice, but this will do until somebody writes some. William Pietri 03:11, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep. Meets WP:BIO, but the article's been tagged for cleanup since April, and no one's cleaned it up. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 04:25, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup Google returns 666 hits on 'Tadeusz Piechura -wiki -answers.com +design'. Article does require attention.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  04:45, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Not a brilliant article, but not an embarrassment either; needs citations urgently, but these facts should be easy to verify if somebody knows where to look. — Haeleth Talk 18:59, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Plenty notable as per WP:BIO. Doesn't need to meet any other qualifications. Why waste time AfDing him? There's no shortage of obscure athletes and tumbleweed townships here. -Advocron 18:08, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.