Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TV IV
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 01:20, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] TV IV
This wiki does not meet any of the current WP:WEB criteria. Its Alexa rank is larger than 300,000, has had no major media coverage that I can find evidence of, and has fewer than 2,000 registered users. We can't include every wiki on the Internet. Delete. Joel7687 20:52, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete another non-notable wiki Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] :: AfD? 21:19, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
- Since it is a byproduct of the SomethingAwful community, perhaps it should be moved over there? Gflores 21:35, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep I think Slashdot counts as "major media." --CygnusTM 15:22, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete NN --Rogerd 02:47, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Large wiki that has had a considerable amount of press attention -- Kafuffle 22:59, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
- Could you give examples of the press attention it has gotten (other than Slashdot)? --Joel7687 18:53, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Although it doesnt completely meet the WP:WEB criteria, i think the wiki sounds like a good idea and needs the attention (and certainly has the potential, given the downfall of TV Tome) in order to grow. ---- jeffthejiff (talk) 11:11, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- I disagree with your idea that we should keep something because it "needs the attention". --Joel7687 18:53, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Yeah, i guess so; it was a pretty crap reasoning. but i still think it should stay. -- jeffthejiff (talk) 19:50, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- I disagree with your idea that we should keep something because it "needs the attention". --Joel7687 18:53, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.