Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TOS TrekMUSE

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —Korath (Talk) 01:01, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] TOS TrekMUSE

Vanity article. Non-notable. Delete --Spinboy 07:05, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

  • 15 players online, as of right now. No vote yet. —Korath (Talk) 07:38, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
    • Comment: The number of players they do or don't have online doesn't establish notability. --Spinboy 07:44, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Concur with Spinboy (although the #players registered would be some indication). 835 googles. Given that the age of MUDs has pretty much passed, that's probably quite a lot, and as such, weak keep. Radiant! 08:50, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, but with reservations. Article needs cleanup and expansion. Megan1967 09:18, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. If I might quote the previous vfd which the nominator appears to have overlooked: "Keep and cleanup - This game seems to have been around for well more than a decade (an eternity in online-game terms). They've also had real Trek actors like Shatner and Nimoy appear in-game as well, which is similarly impressive. I do agree that the current article isn't the best, and the part about connecting needs to go, but the subject is worthy of an article. Starblind 15:49, Jan 9, 2005 (UTC)" Kappa 10:47, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
    • I should point out, that yes, I did notice that, but at the same time, it is still a very poor article, and thus why I re-nominated it. It still hasn't established notability. If y'all want to keep it so badly, work on it. --Spinboy 17:04, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep I agree with me. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:41, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep This went through VfD two months ago; the consensus then was to keep. Unless the site has gone away, there is no reason to delete this article. Kelly Martin 13:32, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.