Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T'ien Lung Tao (2)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. —Korath (Talk) 22:52, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] T'ien Lung Tao

The article has already been deleted, but its previous deletion vote doesn't appear to have been conclusive, so I am renominating it. No evidence of notability, advertisement. Delete unless rewritten. - Mike Rosoft 11:29, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Since it's already been deleted, this should go on WP:VFU instead. Radiant_* 11:38, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: I think Mike is renominating this, because it is a recreation of previously deleted material. Mgm|^(talk) 11:59, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
    • Previous VfD was 4 votes to delete (including implicit vote by nominator) and only 1 vote to keep (not counting anons and sockpuppets). That is conclusive enough for me, how about we speedy this right away? jni 08:55, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Delete as ad and/or not notable. Google shows just 5 unique hits 4 of which are ads and one is a forum post. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:58, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, ad. Megan1967 08:25, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as reposted material. Previous VfD was legit, despite sockpuppet accounts. Newly created martial art. Not notable enough (yet). jni 08:33, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Consider it speedied as a reposted, once-deleted advert. Fire Star 14:50, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.