Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/System-∀99 ∀ Gundam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. W.marsh 00:08, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] System-∀99 ∀ Gundam

Obscure fancruft. Nonnotable and hard to search for due to the weird symbols. KI 04:04, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete As per nom. Bobby1011 04:12, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep we have articles for the USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-C), which is even far less notable and fancrufty not to mention that the Turn A is the centerpiece of a tv show named after it, which probably makes it notable. Timon 04:30, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep as per Timon. Weird symbol but a re-direct for "System-99 Gundam" will be useful. Gundam is as notable as Star Wars and Dragonball. These 2 have "obscure" facts and trivia as well. If the other 2 can be accepted, why not this? -- ^Evanx(tag?) 04:34, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep There already large number of article of Gundam mecha. And Turn A itself is quite standout from other L-Zwei 05:48, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, I'm quite worried at the nominated deletions lately. This is an good article, and though could do with refernces, is in no shape or form qualified for deletion. -Zero^Talk 06:39, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Zero. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 17:04, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep due to precedent, although I wish we didn't have obscure fan trivia here at all, and kept it to the important characters/things. -- Mithent 00:05, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I moved System-∀99 ∀ Gundam to WD-M01 Turn A Gundam. Turn A is an important fictional machine in Japanese animation history. --shikai shaw 04:05, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.