Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzaku FPGA board

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 03:44, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Suzaku FPGA board

NN product, microstub. Article is neutral but its existence here is advertising: Wikipedia is not a catalog. Previous Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SUZAKU FPGA board was closed as a keep but got virtually no input from the community. Mangojuice^talk 12:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atmark Techno had roughly the same level of discussion, and was closed as delete, which is unfortunate because an article on a manufacturer is the obvious merge target for an article on an individual product. Perhaps Atmark Techno, Suzaku FPGA board, and Armadillo CPU Boards should all be (re-)considered together. Uncle G 12:59, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

If so, they should all be deleted. It's a walled garden, and a very old one I might add: these articles were put up in August of 2005, by a user who then vanished. Mangojuice^talk 16:40, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

• Note: Even if the previous AFD was closed only two weeks ago, this listing is legitimate because the previous AFD should have been relisted, not closed. Punkmorten 12:17, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. MER-C 12:40, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Zyudp 13:44, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. No significant content would be lost. --Kunzite 16:03, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.