Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Bowl L

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect to Super Bowl per nom. Redirects are cheap. :) Mailer Diablo 05:07, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Super Bowl L

Delete. This page isn't necessary yet... there aren't even pages for Super Bowls 47-49, so to have a page for 50 when cities haven't even had a chance to bid for the previous few SB's is a bit much. SonicAD 19:21, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Changing my vote to Redirect per RJH, since I for some reason hadn't originally considered it. SonicAD 06:21, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:NOT: "individual items from a predetermined list or a systematic pattern of names, preassigned to future events or discoveries, are not suitable article topics, if only generic information is known about the item." - Bobet 19:23, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. We only have information on Superbowls through Super Bowl XLIV. This is a crystal ball page.--Esprit15d 19:34, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all above. I'm somewhat surprised the creator of this article didn't make the other ones while they were at it. --Kinu 19:40, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Until the circumstances of this event are confirmed, there is no need to have the page on the servers as it isn't useful for research.  (aeropagitica)  23:18, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: Deleted or not, it will remain on the servers forever. Stifle 20:22, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-02-07 00:08Z
• Redirect to Super Bowl for now. Short of Armageddon, this event is very likely to occur. — RJH 16:27, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per RJH. Stifle 20:22, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Partially for not being needed, and partially for forcing me to read the entire Superbowl article to find out what it IS. --King Nintendoid 13:16, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.