Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunshine Way

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 13:46, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sunshine Way

A street somewhere, or maybe not -- a house? Doesn't seem notable (no relevant Google hits for "sunshine way"), and unmaintained. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-07-28 21:51Z

• Weak keep. It seems like a historical housing development. However, it needs some citations and some explanation as to why it's particularly important. The mention about the sunshine rooms is helpful, but that alone isn't necessarily an assertion of notability. --FreelanceWizard 23:51, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete if importance cannot be established, e.g. listed properties, etc. --Dhartung | Talk 01:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 19:27, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete non-notable and unverifable in almost any claim Konman72 11:19, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete the street isn't notable, it's not even mentioned on the Mitcham article --RMHED 15:15, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I added Category:Tuberculosis, which puts the TB reference into context. Before antibiotics, fresh air was one of the few treatments for TB. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 20:23, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn street Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 22:09, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn. —Khoikhoi 00:47, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per TruthbringerToronto. The TB ref/cat does indeed put the article into historical and notable context. Agne 18:44, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 23:32, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep per TruthbringerToronto. Viridae^Talk 00:23, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Notability not established. Seems unverifiable. — NMChico24 03:01, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn per above. Maybe worth a passing mention in the article on Mitcham. Robert A.West (Talk) 06:28, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I think we were going a bit far in haveing an article for every tiny village, every street is going way to far unless there is a very strong reason to say otherwise. Jon513 11:06, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with Mitcham, Surrey, England. Kappa 11:11, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep We shouldn't be noting every street in the world in Wiki, as they're simply not notable, unless, for some particularly reason, such as Rodeo Drive or Hollywood Blvd, they are notable. Given Sunshine Way's particular involvement with TB patients and it's unique architecture to accomodate them, it crosses the line from deletion to being kept. Mugaliens 11:17, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete The TB reference is a canard wrt to notability; this is inherently non-notable. Eusebeus 12:36, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of UK-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 14:04, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - per Mugaliens -- Martinp23 14:30, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete Seems historical, but low google hits, and one paltry reference to a "local paper" digital_me^{(Talk•Contribs)} 14:33, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Mugaliens. Historically interesting. Drett 17:38, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per TruthbringerToronto and others, hoping it may one day be part of a broader article on 'sunshine houses' (e.g. in Leeds) - and other anti-TB housing measures in the UK. [1]--HJMG 17:50, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Mugaliens. NCurse _work 21:26, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Per above. Daniel's page ☎ 23:21, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep per HJMG. the wub "?!" 17:56, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• KeepThere is an historic significance here that the article creator failed to convey. If only we can haul it to the surface. :) Dlohcierekim 06:22, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.