Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Summit Lakes Middle School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Only one keep vote, no potential of reliable sources given evne mentioned in the discussion. — Deckiller 11:27, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Summit Lakes Middle School

Summit Lakes Middle School (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Middle school. No sources listed whatsoever. Article is 9 months old -- that should be plenty of time to find them. Prod disputed, without providing any sources. Shimeru 21:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Schools are not inherently notable. Soltak | Talk 22:49, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Another non-notable school. TJ Spyke 03:11, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete the highschools are bad enough, we certainly don't need junior highs (unless there is a massive shooting at one of them.:-)-MsHyde 03:59, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. No evidence of notability. Should have drawn the line properly with high schools. A year from now we'll be having these debates about elementary schools. WMMartin 20:11, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. To begin with, I want to remind everyone that there is not policy of notability on schools. The requirement of stating some assertion of notability is mainly created on the fact that millions of articles that are commercially based or focused individual self-promotion would be littered all over wikipedia. I believe that if any article that is not advertising in this said manner is viable. In addition, as an additional requirement, I believe that articles should have some substance and according to policy, they should have some referenced material or at least list some legitimate sources. This article appears to have some information, and I am sure that in the future, individuals could work on and improve the article based on these sources. As always, we should not be excluded articles on wikipedia on just notability alone; self-promotion and commercial characteristics of articles with illegitimate sources should be the targets of deletion. This article appears to have some possibility for growth, and I believe that if until some templates for clean up and additional sources are added, and then if no progress is made on the article within a few months, then the article can be properly assessed. --Thank You. Sukh17 ^{Talk | Contribs} 19:42, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Clearly this school does not come close to meeting WP:SCHOOLS. That is the closest to consensus about what a school article needs to meet to merit an article. While there may not be a school notability policy, notability is an issue on the wiki and clearly this article does nothing to assert in any way, shape or form, any type o notability. Vegaswikian 02:59, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.