Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suckage/Archive

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 02:00, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Suckage

Er. Whatever it is, it doesn't belong here. Inter\^Echo 19:19, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Speedy redelete okay by me. -- Infrogmation 19:45, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. It's garbage. Rl 20:11, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete -- nonsense, perhaps even qualifies as patent nonsense. Jonathunder 20:50, 2005 Mar 13 (UTC)
• Delete patent nonsense. Lacrimosus 22:36, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete, patent nonsense. Martg76 23:02, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: Do it, or parts of it, qualify as Bad Jokes and Deleted Nonsense? -- Kizor 00:38, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: The author of the article has been known to vandalize this page. Keep your eyes peeled! -- Kizor 01:12, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity (such a pity it's not a speedy) - David Gerard 01:40, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete the suckage. DaveTheRed 04:28, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity. Tygar 06:09, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep the suckage, you have every other article here
• Delete the suckage, O Speaking Sock. This ain't an article. - Lucky 6.9 22:27, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: Same sock vandalized the legit Sucks page. Bad sock. - Lucky 6.9 22:30, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.