Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subsistent worker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:35, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Subsistent worker

del neologism by a single author, the same one as for Cultural inhibitor neologism. Poured from the same barrel as recently deleted Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ideological nomadism. `'mikka (t) 06:57, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete It's a sociological term created by a non-notable author. Danny Lilithborne 07:09, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, not an established term: 4 unique Google hits out of 10, all seem to be mirroring WP, none make any sense. Not that it matters, but the concept itself doesn't make much sense, either - most people are "persistently one or two paychecks away from falling into dire financial situations that would cause their quality of life to decline". Better covered in working poor. --Thorsten1 09:53, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete original research definately. All three articles ( this one, Ideological nomadism and Cultural inhibitor) seem to be in the same vein as the musings of a single non-notable source with no reliable sources. Peripitus (Talk) 11:24, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.