Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stripping fetishism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:51, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Stripping fetishism

Stripping fetishism (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Sexual arousal from watching someone strip naked seems way too universal to be considered a fetish. "Stripping fetishism" only gets 792 Ghits. Robotman1974 03:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete before we get naked woman fetish. ReverendG 03:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete though, I think I might have this fetishsim. I definately have sexual intercourse fetishism. Should I create an article about it? --Jayron32 05:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Haha, per Jyron32. A fetish implies that something is outside of the ordinary. Unless some kind of data can be shown that there is an observable group of people that can only or primarily derive sexual satisfaction from the act of becoming nude then this is just a neologism for "People that enjoy nudity". NeoFreak 06:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Jeez, now I know what I've had all these years! Do I go see a doctor about it? Is there a patch for it? Man, this article has changed my life! ;) Thanks, Spawn Man 06:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete This is more than adequately covered in Voyeur and Exhibitionism, and there is no mergeable content, or use as a redirect. --RoninBK_ETC 08:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per everyone else. Arousal from seeing naked people is way too common to be a sexual fetish. JIP | Talk 09:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm not the only one? So I'm normal?! Wow, what a relief! ;) (Tongue in cheek of course...) Spawn Man 09:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - WP:BOLLOCKS - ouch, that's an awful pun - but seriously, a fetish implies abnormality. Moreschi 14:09, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as apparent original research and probably neologism. Bucketsofg 14:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete- LOL. This cant be true... Getting aroused from stripping is a Fetish? Arctic-Editor 15:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per NeoFreak's reasoning, less we get Attractive Body Fetish.-- danntm ^T _C 16:09, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Per above. A normal behaviour pattern is not, by definition, fetishistic (is that a real word?)--Anthony.bradbury 22:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete What's fetishy or abnormal about getting aroused watching a stripper?--John Lake 23:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, not every method of sexual arousal needs its own "fetish," people. --Mr. Lefty (talk) 23:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into some fetish related article. Yankee Rajput 03:09, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.