Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Straus Pavement Damage Estimate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete vanity spam. Guy 11:08, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Straus Pavement Damage Estimate

Vanity article. EngineerScotty 00:02, 27 September 2006 (UTC).

• Comment:See also AFDs for the following:

1. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynamic Vision Assessment for Transportation
2. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Automated Driver's License Test
3. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynamic Assessment for Transportation
4. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vision Assessment Procedure for Transportation
5. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Straus Pavement Damage Estimate

--EngineerScotty 00:06, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as per nomination, I wish people would stick to just creating their one line autobio vanity stub that can be speedy deleted on sight. Equendil Talk 00:53, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• PLEASE do not delete this entry. It is not an autobio. It is not a vanity autobio snub. It is referenced by government publications. Please ignore EngineerScotty and Equendil. The are not qualified to make this determination and are not educated in the art germane to this information. Fqm6254 01:14, 27 September 2006 (UTC) User's first edit. Surprise surprise.
• NYer 01:21, 27 September 2006 (UTC) EngineerScotty and Equendil are retailiating against me User:NYer for earlier complaints I made against certain Wikipedia administrators. Please DO NOT delete this entry. Furthermore, they are not pavement engineers and this information is cited by government sources. Thank you.NYer 01:21, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. I moved the two comments above in their current place, as they had (both) been added at the top messing up with the layout. Chronological order respected. I suppose pointing out that we're in the middle of a puppetshow is unnecessary but just in case... Equendil Talk 01:30, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This is a general encyclopedia, not PavementEngineeropedia, and certainly not a publicity service for pavement engineering consultants. And before NYer/User:Sandystraus/Fqm6254 pulls the bogus "Anti-American" card, I'm an American, and I know nonsense when I see it. --Calton | Talk 01:35, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Please ignore Calton, another friend of EngineerScotty and Equendil who seeks to retailiate against me and therefore delete all of my entries under false allegations and nonsensical remarks.NYer 01:52, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Put a cork in it, Sandy, you're not fooling anyone. I don't know EngineerScotty and Equendil from a hole in the ground, though -- going out on a limb here -- I'm guessing that the former is an engineer. --Calton | Talk 05:05, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete with extreme prejudice, extreme vanity by someone attempting to disrupt Wikipedia for their own gain. User:Zoe|(talk) 01:58, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 02:09, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Tom Harrison ^Talk 02:12, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --physicq210 02:19, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Zoe. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 02:32, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this is just pure vanity.-- danntm ^T _C 02:33, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Gwernol 02:35, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom --Charlesknight 08:33, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Michael Kinyon 09:32, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.