Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Oram

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. ➨ ЯЄDVERS 21:40, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Steve Oram

Appears to be a vanity article by the subject. Notability not established in article. Was speedy deleted CSD-A7 once, recreated and nominated for CSD-A7 again; {hangon} applied but not rational provided for hanging on. Rather than keep up this cycle, I'm bringing the article here. No opinion from me.➨ ЯЄDVERS 19:41, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Have edited the article so it is hopefuly more in line with guidelines. Apologies, new to wikipedia. --Steve Oram 11:30, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 12:24, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

• Keep It's the credits of a working actor, with links to website and IMDB entry. To this extent (in my opinion) there's no difference between this page and one for, say, Harrison Ford except in degree. Markeer 13:00, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Despite the fact it was written by the subject he is a notable working actor and screenwriter in the UK. Ben W Bell talk 13:33, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - a fair few movie and TV credits, Edinburgh fringe festival etc... certainly notable enough - Peripitus (Talk) 13:49, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.