Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve.museum (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy close, clerical error, deletion was endorsed at DRV. ~ trialsanderrors 06:28, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Steve.museum

Steve.museum (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

A prior AfD, speedily closed as delete, was overturned at WP:DRV and is now here for full discussion. Procedural listing, I have no opinion. trialsanderrors 06:14, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as non-notable, registering that I'm not entirely sure how you got the decision to relist out of the DRV. An AfD isn't bad, though. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 06:17, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to .museum and perhaps give a brief mention there, if it can be inserted without disrupting the flow of the article. Subject is obviously legit, per the plenty of sources and the fact that there are not many sites on the .museum domain, as registration criteria are very, very stringent. However, not sure that this quite merits its own article, so I pick the middle-of-the-road approach. --Czj 06:26, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.