Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Cobden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mindmatrix 20:04, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Stephen Cobden

No references to claims of this persons activites, and may be vanity Lancer Sykera 00:28, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as obvious hoax and vanity. --Metropolitan90 01:48, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, hoax --Interiot 06:54, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Not sure it's vanity, but probably a hoax —the preceding unsigned comment is by 129.12.234.51 (talk • contribs) 11:51, 2005 December 13 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- JJay 22:23, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, hoax. Pretty funny one, though. --Thunk 15:25, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - certainly has claims of notoriety. I just read what L'éminence grise means. Influential in government circles? Woah. But then, let's see, born 1985 - surely he'd have to be at least mid 20s, but more realistically mid 40s to have that kind of power. And the only 3 references to him on the net were these 2 photos: [1] and [2] and this review by him [3]. Whilst the undercover influence might not be in google, if he was linked to presidential campaigns (especially at the age of 14 or 15, as he would have been in 2000), I would have expected them to be in Google. They aren't. So this is, quite obviously, a hoax. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 11:11, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.