Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Jaramillo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Agent 86 01:08, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Stephanie Jaramillo

Stephanie Jaramillo (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

There is nothing in this article that asserts the subject's notability per Wikipedia:Notability, and it appears to read like a promotions piece. SunStar Net^talk 16:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

• Weak keep but stubify as current text is a copyvio from Women's Boxing. She was promoted by Don King so she's not a nobody. --Dhartung | Talk 17:49, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I nominated this at AFD based on the fact it looked more like a promotional piece, rather than an encyclopedic article. Now that notability has been mentioned, I may change my vote to a Weak keep per above. --SunStar Net^talk 18:47, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep needs to be cleaned up, but jaramillo has done enough for notabllity, I hope this entry is not being bashed because she is a female boxer, and not male. --zoso_uk | Talk 13:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and clean up, if in the boxing hall of fame she must be notable Alf photoman 21:34, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

• Comment A search for the alleged "hall of fame" only returns 8 hits on Google [1] 81.155.178.248 00:41, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.