Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Srully Blotnick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-12-28 10:55Z

[edit] Srully Blotnick

Srully Blotnick (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Speedy deletion for WP:CSD A7—no assertion of notability—was overturned at deletion review and is now here for consideration. Procedural listing (the second in a series of two), so I have no opinion. ~ trialsanderrors 06:26, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

• Keep Sufficient notability and verifiability for me. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 06:34, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. See talk page for additional reliable sources not currently in the references on the main article. Jokestress 06:56, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Notability established by works being listed at Library of Congress. Eddie.willers 13:19, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Open and shut notability given our . See Talk:Srully Blotnick for 10 NY Times articles, including some articles about Blotnick and reviews of his books. --A. B. ^(talk) 18:01, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Now that the article has been restored and history can be reviewed, it becomes harder and harder to assume that the CSD was created in good faith. The article as deleted met standards for notability and as it stands it goes above and beyond the minimum standards for inclusion. Alansohn 23:24, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, what did they mean by WP:CSD A7 ? Sometimes I wonder if there should not be a safeguard against Speedy deletions Alf photoman 14:11, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Seems noteable and has good verifiable sources. It could use some expanding to fill in the missing gaps. Davidpdx 13:06, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.