Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Splecks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 04:56, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Splecks

Reference to unimportant shape with its importance not asserted properly. Contested prod, the tag has been removed but reverted due to bad edits. i.e. "they are fucking awesome" Fails pretty much everything. No reliable sources or references for actual info. I could go on but I personally think it has nothing really going for it. WikiSlasher 12:43, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

• Strong delete. --WikiSlasher 12:45, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP:Complete bollocks QuiteUnusual 12:48, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• CSD as nonsense: The spleck is quite a new discovery only found on the 16th October 2006... (|-- UlTiMuS 13:02, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

• I believe the CSD only applies to patent nonsense. But otherwise your point is perfectly valid - I forgot to mention it was original research. --WikiSlasher 13:40, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete Total nonsense. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:16, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nonsense thought up on a dull day. Emeraude 15:34, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.