Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spencer rogers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:53, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Spencer rogers

Nonnotable Internet marketer, seems to be using WP to promote himself and his business (see also Seoluv). NawlinWiki 14:24, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

• Update Adding Seoluv to this nom after author deleted prod and advert tags. NawlinWiki 14:39, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Does not meet criteria for WP:BIO. Little more than advertising. CindyLooWho 15:09, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:BIO, article is little more than adverstising to his blog. DrunkenSmurf 15:34, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete both . Advertising. Dlyons493 Talk 15:44, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
• This site does meet the criteria because of very unusual access to Asian market of outsourced SEO. Does meet criteria and is NOT advertising, please check site.

I am NOT at all surprised by this harassment from editors who believe the World revolves around the US.

This is not something that you understand therefore you want to delete it. This site is not an Internet Marketer nor is it non notable. Rare interviews from remote SEO firms outsourcing to the 1st World. I believe that there a more people that want to read this than you.

Author takes his own money and time and travels into remote areas that are on the United States State Department travel warnings list to secure interviews of very remote and very inaccessible Search Engine Optimization firms / sweatshops and give poignant views of the discrepancies between the cultures and the spread between the 1st World and the 3rd. This site serves as a caveat to all who would use fraudulent SEO firms in the 3rd World to attempt to garner priority and end up with nothing but getting ripped off.

This site is going to stay up! — Possible single purpose account: 210.5.119.202 (talk • contribs) has made little or no other contributions outside this topic.

• Delete both per nom. Bigtop 17:40, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Stephenb (Talk) 17:40, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete both as spam. Gazpacho 20:46, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete both as spam. Actually I can show quite a few forum posts and posts on WebmasterRadio, where this site owner has incessantly spammed his seo services. This wiki entry is nothing but self-promotion and marketing of a sales website. It should not be included here at all. Nuclei 13:40, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete both as spam. Eclipsed 13:47, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• If you can do this then do it!

It's hard to compete with being a journalist and willing to take risks to get the story.

Those posts probably not the author because unfortuantely webmaster radio is a magnet for spam. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 210.5.119.202 (talk • contribs).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.