Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spectrasexuality

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:22, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Spectrasexuality

• Delete: Appears to be a hoax unverifiable. Prod tag was added and removed but re-added - which is a no-no. Last prod comment was Appears to be a neologism. Not a single use found in Google. Asked original editor where the word came from, no response yet. —Wknight94 (talk) 15:00, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I was the original prod-ing editor. Not sure why I proded it twice; I know that's not supposed to happen. Nevertheless, this is still a neologism. I don't think it's a hoax. STGM (talk • contribs) was the creating author, and has plenty of legit edits under his/her/its belt. eaolson 15:15, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete The only google hits [1] are for this article. At best this is a dictionary definition for a neologism. -- IslaySolomon | talk 15:46, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per IslaySolomon. No evidence of use of this term outside Wikipedia itself. --Metropolitan90 16:20, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• No Google scholar hit, tried different spelling. Pavel Vozenilek 17:24, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nominated; unverifiable and very limited, if any, use. AuburnPilot^Talk 01:37, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete; seems rather neologistic to me. I'm also not terribly inclined to put all that much stock in an article whose first edit is marked with the edit summary "coinage". Bearcat 08:17, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.