Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Special rights

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 02:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Special rights

Special rights (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Unnecessary content fork/POV fork from LGBT social movements. Fireplace 08:12, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete or transwiki - this article does not have much to say about special rights other than a definition. Either it should go to Wiktionary (if it is notable, which I'm not sure it is) or just be deleted. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 11:27, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep The term is used often enough to be considered notable. I've removed a decent chunk of the text than made seem like it was only applied to LGBT right. It is no longer a POV fork. Koweja 16:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per Koweja. The article needs work, but the term has application beyond LGBT issues. It's widely used in relation to all kinds of affirmative action, civil rights, and hate crime debates. PubliusFL 16:33, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per Koweja and PubliusFL. The article needs to be expanded a lot, but is worth keeping. -- Chairman S. Talk ^Contribs 20:33, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per Koweja and PubliusFL. The term has general applicability and any orientation towrad LGBT issues has been removed by Koweja. -- Black Falcon 21:38, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, term has been in somewhat wide use for a long time. Dragomiloff 01:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.