Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solarmon
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Izehar 22:21, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Solarmon
do we really need a page for each of these?Hirudo 20:13, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Exterminate with extreme prejudice. Nuke it, nuke it, nuke it! Flyboy Will 20:15, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- No, Delete --Petros471 20:39, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Agnte 20:56, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Question: I've found at least a dozen pages exactly like this. If concensus is that this type of page should be deleted, is there an established procedure to nominate all of them simultaneously? Hirudo 20:45, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- List them all in a single new nomination I suppose? Flyboy Will 20:48, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Yep. Or merge the data onto one page as per WP:FICT. Agnte 20:56, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Merge is better than delete. But I think we should await the outcome of this discussion. I contacted the article creator. Punkmorten 20:56, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- There also exists at least two categories, Category:Dark Pokémon and Category:Fire Pokémon with articles about individual Pokemon. Has any of this come up before? Hirudo 22:04, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Individual Pokemon have been nominated before, and kept. Note that the qualitative difference between Solarmon and, say, Houndoom is astounding. Punkmorten 22:24, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- If it's being deleted because of lack of info then why don't we add information regarding its appearances in video games (see Ryo Akiyama and Jijimon)? N. Harmonik 03:18, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- Individual Pokemon have been nominated before, and kept. Note that the qualitative difference between Solarmon and, say, Houndoom is astounding. Punkmorten 22:24, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- There also exists at least two categories, Category:Dark Pokémon and Category:Fire Pokémon with articles about individual Pokemon. Has any of this come up before? Hirudo 22:04, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Merge is better than delete. But I think we should await the outcome of this discussion. I contacted the article creator. Punkmorten 20:56, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Yep. Or merge the data onto one page as per WP:FICT. Agnte 20:56, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- List them all in a single new nomination I suppose? Flyboy Will 20:48, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete r3m0t talk 21:38, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. No need for the page: this is not a Digimon fandom listing. --Thephotoman 21:45, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. The subject could merit an article or list if it doesn't have one already. Durova 22:11, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Weak delete, I think the reason that all the digimon should not have their own page while all the pokémon should is probably because of the astounding difference in interest between the two franchises. Stifle 23:49, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
