Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Socialite list

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Deathphoenix ʕ 03:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Socialite list

List of the 'best' socialites. Probably falls under WP:OR and/or WP:NPOV. Deprodded by author with explaination "Real list please do not delete." given in article. Matt Eason 16:20, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, unless the author can come up with a better reason to keep it. RedRollerskate 16:37, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Non-notable list reflecting the opinion of a non-notable group. MysteryDog 16:39, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Couldn't find any reference to this list or to a "Socialites List Inc" anywhere online. Even if it is a genuine list, all the article does is duplicate it. David L Rattigan 17:02, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• "Created by Socialite List INC." Deleted by Wikipedia. We have a Category for this. Fan1967 17:21, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Note The first name on the list appears to be nobody special, and may be the reason for the article. Fan1967 17:26, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per the obvious reason that the article is crap. As far as Fan1967's note, the first person on the list (which, as you found, barely Googles) was for a person for whom the same contributor also created an article. However, it had already been deleted twice before, so I slapped the {{db-repost}} tag on it, and it's already gone once again. -- Kicking222 17:30, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete because. Danny Lilithborne 22:43, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete - as nom. --Ragib 22:44, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and if an admin can verify Kicking222's assertion that it has been deleted twice before then it should be Speedy Deleted and Salted. GRBerry 21:13, 14 June 2006 (UTC) Struck text based on below comments. Continue to believe delete for too many reasons to elaborate in full - OR, Vanity, listcruft, no context, etc... But hey, at least it wasn't spam. GRBerry 18:01, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

• Comment I think Kicking222 was referring to a biographical article belonging to one of the names on the list that has been deleted before, not this article. There's nothing in the deletion log for Socialite list. Matt Eason 22:25, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

• Comment. He was referring to the first name on the list, who, based on the few forum postings under her name that turn up in google, is a non-notable Canadian teenager. Fan1967 04:03, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Not notable, largely comrpomised of original research and not exactly written in a neutral point of view.--Auger Martel 11:03, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.