Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snow Planet
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 19:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Snow Planet
Non-notable, also possible spam. Jvhertum 14:17, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- Very Strong Keep, isn't spam and this place does exist (though never been there). Note that it says "indoor snow recreation centre located in Silverdale on the Hibiscus Coast". The Hibiscus Coast is at the far north end of New Zealand, hence very warm. And there has been an indoor ski slope built there! So none too surprisingly it has been subject of a large amount of media attention. I've you haven't found it when I've woken up I'll look it up myself, but for now I'm off to sleep (is after 6am over here!). Mathmo Talk 17:04, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete this definite spam. Edeans 22:04, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep "Snowplanet is the only all-year snow resort in the Southern hemisphere." -Freekee 03:59, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Very Strong Keep How can this even be spam? It has a link to the official site with photographs of the attraction, both inside and out. This is not spam - I simply started a page on Snow Planet because one hadn't been made yet. --KylePIB 05:25, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete for now, but don't salt the earth just yet. Work on this in userspace, because it SOUNDS spammy right now, even if it isn't intended that way. — CJewell (talk to me) 18:36, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete unless sources that meet WP:RS are provided, at this point it looks like non notable spam. --Daniel J. Leivick 04:30, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Delete that will change to keep if WP:N sources can be provided. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 04:49, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep for the reasons given previously. - Axver 12:37, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep per this search... Addhoc 16:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
