Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slotted spoon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Mindmatrix 20:04, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Slotted spoon

Dicdef. Content could easily go into Spoon. Klaw ¡digame! 23:59, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

• A redirect to spoon is the way to go in this situation. CDC (talk) 00:18, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, encyclopedic topic, failing that merge/redirect. Kappa 00:19, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete; not even a dicdef. Tom Harrison ^(talk) 03:26, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect.... though delete would be OK too. Jamie 04:06, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Obvious merge to spoon, which already has a list of various subtypes; the bare "slotted spoon" entry there is just begging for this one-liner's content. —Cryptic (talk) 07:35, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. A slotted spoon is called a spork. No need for a redirect. •DanMS 21:11, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment. A slotted spoon isn't a spork; it's a spoon with holes in it to allow the chef to hold solid foods in the spoon while the cooking liquid drains off. GIS for slotted spoon | Klaw ¡digame! 21:13, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and please read the relevant articles before voting. Wikipedia also has Wooden spoon and this is about as notable. Slotted spoons serve a specific use in cooking. These are preparation utensils, not sporks. The format of the current Spoon article would reworking in order to redirect. Durova 03:51, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment. Wooden spoons have a long history which allowed that article to develop into a full-length entry. I use slotted spoons all the time, but I don't see slotted spoon ever going beyond stub status. | Klaw ¡digame! 04:00, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
    • Comment The slotted spoon has cultural significance as part of the traditional French absinthe ritual. I've rewritten the article and added external links to reflect this. Durova 04:48, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per above. -- JJay 22:24, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, important. Christopher Parham (talk) 15:49, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - real thing. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 06:16, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.