Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slime Volleyball

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The 'keep' voters' reasons were just google searches and WP:ILIKEIT, but the 'delete' voters didn't give a good reason either. Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 17:22, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

ATTENTION! If you came here because somebody asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus amongst Wikipedia editors on whether a page or group of pages is suitable for this encyclopedia. We have policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. You can participate and give your opinion. Please sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Happy editing! Note: Comments made by suspected single purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username|UTC timestamp [optional]}}

[edit] Slime Volleyball

Slime Volleyball (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Nonnotable browser game. NawlinWiki 16:28, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

• Keep Good article and google search returns plenty of references to the game enderminh 03:12, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Most, if not all, of the Google search result hits are links to a page where the game can be played. Luke! 18:49, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

• Must Keep I have used this article a lot when playing the game and it has been very helpful it could be merged with a larger Slime Games page so there could be more information about all the slime games.

Wikipedia is not a how-to manual. Luke! 18:49, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

• Weak keep could use some references. I know they're out there, but finding them could be tricky i kan reed 16:16, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

• Comment, there's a wiki on this game and thousands of sites mirror it. 58.178.38.214 07:21, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Just because a wiki exists for it, does not mean that it should be included on Wikipedia. Luke! 18:49, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

• Keep - It's becoming one of those popular internet thingamajigs. --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 10:17, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Popularity is subjective without available reliable sources to verify this claim. Luke! 18:49, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

• Keep - This is the best damn game ever, and a very notable article, google returns plenty of entries on this.--74.92.39.156 15:02, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Again, high subjective claim that is not based on any reputably published source - that I could find. Luke! 18:49, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete & Re-direct - to Tennis for Two, with perhaps an inline mention as a variant of the game. Luke! 18:49, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
• Must Keep I disagre completely I think that the game is great and diserves it own page Leoman44 17:15, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.