Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skybolt Fusion Reactor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete -- (☺drini♫|☎) 02:36, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Skybolt Fusion Reactor

At best original research. The concept is unknown in the fusion energy community, and certainly hasn't been published in a reputable journal. Art Carlson 08:14, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Looks like original research--Exir Kamalabadi^Esperanza 08:28, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
• They laughed at Newton and Einstein too! Oh, uh, sorry, Delete. It's original research, not peer-reviewed or published. And it's not a notable pseudoscience area deserving of discussion, but rather a single crackpot's invention and theory. Bunchofgrapes 18:53, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Improbable in the extreme; requires references or a proof by existence. Sliggy 20:06, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete "Original research". At this time there is the same diskussion in the german wikipedia. -- Andy.we 07:34, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
  Wo genau? --Art Carlson 09:19, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
• Hi Art: Skybolt Diskussion is at de:Wikipedia:Löschkandidaten/27._September_2005 (Nr. 24). Gruß -- Andy.we 12:27, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
• This fusion reactort comes complete with its own Theory of everything but unfortunately without any secondary sources, verifyability or at least a hint that anybody but the inventor is caring about this stuff. Delete. --Pjacobi 12:59, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.