Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir Kevin of Roddy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete and BJAODN. - Mailer Diablo 09:14, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sir Kevin of Roddy

Probable hoax. Zero search results for "Sir Kevin of Roddy". Delete unless verified in some other fashion. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 18:16, Dec. 17, 2005

• Delete, possible BJAODN. —Etaoin (talk) 18:18, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Just because it can't be found on Google doesn't mean it doesn't exist. That's why it was posted!
  • Note User:Rith (the article's author) anonymously left the line above. I left a vandalism warning on his/her user page. Chris the speller 19:52, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom Tom Harrison ^(talk) 19:24, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - not funny enough for BJAODN. (If you're going to hoax, it helps not to have anachronisms like people born in 765 going on voyages to America in 1000 and dying in battle in 1066). Tearlach 19:39, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

• Comment: Especially when Charlemagne wasn't ruling yet. TimBentley 02:54, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Hoax, pure and simple. Chris the speller 19:52, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete, pure hoax, get rid of it ASAP. --Cyde Weys _talk^contribs 21:27, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

• BJAODN- an amusing read. Reyk 22:07, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

• BJAODN per Reyk. Stifle 02:22, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.