Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simply Insane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Robert ^{T | @ | C} 21:30, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Simply Insane

Non-notable, unverifiable, vaporware, and/or prank. Zero hits for "Simply Insane" "Rhys Williams". Also, WP is not a crystal ball. 24.17.48.241 02:42, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

Also seems likely to be self-promotion--both the IP for the WP contributor and the SI website both resolve to the same ISP in Amsterdam: RIPE Network Coordination Centre. Also only 3 hits for "Simply Insane" MekahDexa. 24.17.48.241 04:14, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

Keep. Looks pretty verifiable to me. They managed to get an extensive article and darn good website designers. They got a lot of stuff going for them. I see nothing wrong with this article. Maybe make the title less ambiguous-- Hurricane Eric - my dropsonde 02:50, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

• A bunch of kids are well connected and get somebody to make a website for them that looks good. One of them has a game "currently in development." And this game needs an encyclopedia article? I don't think so. Delete.—Gaff ^ταλκ 04:26, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. This seems to fall under the radar of unsigned bands with fancy websites. Non-notable yet.  freshgavinΓΛĿЌ  06:02, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete in development game. The only way in dev games are appropriate is when they are anticipated sequels (i.e. Final Fantasy XII with a very high probability of delivery. No reasonable expectation this game will ever be released. I wish them luck, but I've beta'd far too many games from first time development houses that never saw the light of day to bet on a release by a first time development company.--Isotope23 20:49, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Isotope. Dottore So 12:00, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.