Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigma Phi Lambda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. -Splash^talk 00:25, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sigma Phi Lambda

Non-notable fraternity. Article self-nominates, in part, by the line "Famous Alumnae: None". Stifle 14:57, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Non-notable Prashanthns 14:58, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Robin Johnson 15:13, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
• weak keep it's a national sorority with 17 chapters. That seems notable enough. (Also note that I did some cleanup work on the page since it was nominated - it's more leible now). -- Bachrach44 15:25, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: 128.227.8.179 removed the AFD notice in this edit. Stifle 16:08, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per Bachrach44 Jcuk 16:11, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I'm not that familiar with these sorts of organisations, but surely just because they have no famous alumnae doesn't make it non-notable. The rest of the article seems OK to keep now.Evil Eye 16:37, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge as with the others before. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 22:47, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above + no valid reason given for deletion. Picture has to go obviously. -- JJay 02:44, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Very Weak Keep per Bachrach44, Delete the picture. -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 04:54, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: WP:BAI lists this as a bad article to create. Stifle 03:02, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.