Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigma Chi Cal Poly Pomona

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge with Cal Poly Pomona. --Angr (t·c) 18:29, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sigma Chi Cal Poly Pomona

This article was previously listed as an article for speedy deletion, but it doesn't seem to have the requirements. Although this is not my afd, I reccomend to merge with Cal Poly Pomona. JHMM13 (T | C) 03:34, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete - I admit I wrongfully tagged this for a speedy delete. I don't think this is a notable organization that deserves its own article nor do I think merging it into the associated college is a good idea. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mayurpatel (talk • contribs).
  • Comment: Please sign your comments so we know who wrote what. To do this, leave four tildes like this: ~~~~. Thanks, JHMM13 (T | C) 03:55, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep or merge per nom. -- JJay 05:09, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Merge per nomination. Student organizations change too rapidly to maintain as separate articles. A few newsworthy exceptions exist such as the Dartmouth Review. This group's impact is purely local. Durova 08:18, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Merge any notable content into existing articles on Cal Poly Pomona and Sigma Chi; I've already added this chapter to the list in the Sigma Chi article. Engineer Bob 10:18, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Merge as with other student organisations Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 23:17, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete with prejudice (I hate Fraternities) - very few frats are notable and keeping random frat articles sets a worrying precedent. I know there are 13,824 different possible combinations of three Greek letters, but Wikipedia is not WikiFrats, nor do I want it to be. Stifle 02:00, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.