Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shin Wen-Bing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-22 13:49Z

[edit] Shin Wen-Bing

Shin Wen-Bing (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not notable. Ideogram 02:13, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- Eastmain 02:40, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletions. -- Eastmain 02:40, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. University presidents are usually notable. Perhaps someone who reads Chinese will be able to expand the article. --Eastmain 02:40, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep per WP:PROF. -- feb^talk 06:16, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
• Comment, I created this article as a result of monitoring new pages. Some one was authoring tons of content on Southern Taiwan University of Technology, and so I was trying to clean up everything. I have no preference whether it stays or goes, though I do feel it is notable. -- Zanimum 14:06, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. As the mayor of a city and president of a University he deserves an article JameiLei 15:23, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Everything in the article says that this man is notable. If the article had been tagged with {{sources}} or the like, I would have voted delete; but bringing it to Afd without any attempt to give editors time to dig up sources is lacking WP:FAITH. John Vandenberg 03:03, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Comment John, technically sources are supposed to be provided when information is added. Quite frankly, a page shouldn't be created nor should information be added unless sources are provided at the same time so it really isn't a violation of WP:FAITH. --The Way 08:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

This article was created before we really started cracking down on sourcing. Anyway, it's a fairly sourcable article, it's not like some topic where there's likely to be argument or lies slipped in. -- Zanimum 14:29, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. Doubly notable as a university president and town mayor. Can we do better than "not notable" when presenting arguments to delete something? (jarbarf) 00:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.