Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shasha Navazesh
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete Jtkiefer T | @ | C ----- 06:25, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Shasha Navazesh
Owner of Shasha bread Co.Inc, listed for deletion above. Only 236 results on Google for this person. NSR (talk) 00:04, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. NN. Only 64 unique Google hits. He seems like a nice guy and all, but the article has no claim to notability other than owning a bread company and founding the "Artisan Bakers Quality Alliance", which has only 59 hits, most are the same hits as above. He isn't notable enough to have outside references we can check, so unverifiable. --A D Monroe III 02:10, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.Gator1 02:12, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - nn vanity CLW 09:36, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. - Sensor 16:29, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. The mere fact of an individual's existence makes him notable enough for inclusion. Kurt Weber 19:08, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- If you object to the policy, the appropriate response is to debate whether the policy should be changed, in the appropriate venues for such a discussion (i.e. the policy talk pages). It is not to simply act as if the policy doesn't exist or to deliberately disregard it for ideological reasons. The mere fact of an individual's existence does not make him notable enough for inclusion; if that were the case, I'd deserve an article about me. But, in reality, as things currently stand I quite clearly don't, given that I've never done anything in which someone who doesn't know me personally would have even the slightest interest. Delete. Bearcat 17:12, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- This is possibly the most ridiculous reason for keeping an article that I've ever seen. This is an encyclopedia, not a vanity site. - Sensor 21:24, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Dottore So 21:32, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Sigh... Denni☯ 22:18, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not per Kurt Weber. Punkmorten 21:48, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete NN --Rogerd 04:42, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.