Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexile
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-18 08:17Z
[edit] Sexile
I'm not sure if this warrants more than a wiktionary redirect Tejastheory 01:35, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as a neologism and a dicdef. --TBCΦtalk? 01:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Kntrabssi 01:57, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Neologism, I'm suprised this even made it in Wiktionary. Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 02:00, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary, plus Wikitionary already has a definition on it, redundant to be here. Wooyi 02:12, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as dictionary definition. Alex43223 T | C | E 03:25, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I agree this is just a definition and belongs in Wiktionary, but feel obligated to point out it's not a neologism. Other than the references from the article, here's a published reference from 2004. Kevinsam 07:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- I was looking at that source as well, although it's not exactly an authoritative source: just a 'sex columnist' student writing on the subject. Tejastheory 07:41, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Your point is well-taken. While the term is clearly widely used and not all that new, no academic I can find has bothered to write about it yet... Kevinsam 18:25, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- delete per above. /Blaxthos 09:56, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- As a strong inclusionist I'd like to be able to say keep, but ultimately this is the sort of thing that belongs in Urban Dictionary and, at best, Wiktionary.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 14:03, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete and add to WP:BJAODN Al-Bargit 17:57, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Note the deletion log, it's been inappropriately speedied twice. -- stillnotelf is invisible 03:10, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
