Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexidate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Kilo-Lima|^(talk) 12:01, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sexidate

Advert for a non-notable swinging website, created by an account which has done nothing but add wikilinks and external links to his website (see Special:Contributions/Noam55). He stopped spamming after being given a last warning, but removed the prod tag on this article, so AFD it is. Delete. Sam Blanning^(talk) 13:48, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Non-notable spam. Kel-nage 14:04, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as advertisement. Metamagician3000 14:28, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete, ad. Vulcanstar6 15:12, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

• Regrettably, advertising is not a speedy deletion criterion. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 15:16, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. advertisement / uninformative. User:Daybot 18:44, 10 April 2006 (BST)
• Delete per nome. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 18:11, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Rather of a pity it couldn't be deleted under G5 (Banned user) but Noam55 was blocked after the article was created (doh!) so AfD delete it is. Petros471 18:23, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Comment 217.132.248.153 (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log) (probably the original author as a shadowpuppet) keeps removing the AfD tag every few hours, so please check that it's still there. I've warned him up to {{drmafd3}}. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 21:48, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Comment In the interests of fairly presenting all views expressed in this discussion, that particular IP said "Sexidate should stay at wikipedia and NOT be deleted! Adultfriendfinder and sdate are here so sexidate should also be. This is an open directory that is made by the public and this article has interest for at least 10,000 or more and this is a great reason for itself to keep it." on Talk:Sexidate. Petros471 21:55, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, advertising. Dpbsmith (talk) 00:24, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and add cats such as BDSM. This article is well-written, mentioning relevant encyclopedic matter, like the sexual revolution. I couldn't have done it better myself. GilliamJF 06:42, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete Article is poorly written and site non-notable (Alexa ranking over six million for goodness sake) - Glen ^T _C 07:19, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
• Comment There was a duplicate article at Sexidates, I have redirected it to this one. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 13:14, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
• ....Well, Delete. Advertisement of a non-notable site.Freddie 01:22, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete ad --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 05:53, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.